Lucrezia Stefanini vs Magali Kempen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L L W L
Form
W L W L W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Stefanini 1 - 1 Kempen
They have played 6 sets in total, with Stefanini winning 3 and Kempen winning 3. The last match between Stefanini and Kempen was at the Veneto Open - Gaiba, 20-06-2023, First, Grass with Lucrezia Stefanini getting the victory 3-6 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lucrezia Stefanini | 1 |
| Magali Kempen | 1 |
Veneto Open - Gaiba(20-06-2023)
3
6
6
2
7
5
| Stefanini | Stats | Kempen |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (14-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 150 | Ranking | 827 |
| 99 | Highest Rank | 191 |
| 26 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 11 |
| 56% (321-249) | Career Total W/L | 63% (262-156) |
| $482,272 | Career Prize Money | $2,000 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Magali Kempen
77%
(
70 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 28 | Games Won | 31 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 2:28:19 | Average Match Time | 2:28:19 |
| 74% (142/192) | 1st Serve % | 55% (109/197) |
| 56% (80/142) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (65/109) |
| 44% (22/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (42/88) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (12/21) |
| 46% (90/197) | Return Points Win % | 47% (90/192) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lucrezia Stefanini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Teodora Kostovic
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
44%
(
17 of
39)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Erika Andreeva
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Ysaline Bonaventure
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Cristina Bucsa
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
54%
(
40 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
121)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
56 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
64 of
121)
108
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
80%
(
68 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
49%
(
47 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Magali Kempen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vivian Wolff
Player
Magali Kempen
70%
(
87 of
125)
1st Serve %
74%
(
71 of
96)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Lara Schmidt
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Magali Kempen
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
7
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Magali Kempen
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Elena Jamshidi
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Magali Kempen
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (321/249) | Win/Loss | 63% (262/156) |
| 56% (721/575) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (588/373) |
| 53% (6195/5523) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4813/3917) |
| 63% (108/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (129/66) |
| 53% (165/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (73/56) |
| 54% (38/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (58/30) |
| 53% (10/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 233 | Aces Total | 724 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1367 | Total Double Faults | 1458 |
| 1:32:15 | Average Match Time | 1:18:11 |
| 452.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 506.52 |
| 72% (25032/34931) | 1st Serve % | 68% (15475/22727) |
| 56% (14131/25032) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9848/15475) |
| 44% (4405/9900) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3277/7262) |
| 52% (2454/4749) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1476/2946) |
| 49% (16686/33805) | Return Points Win % | 47% (10862/23108) |
| 44% (11/14) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 36% (4/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (27/28) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (187/140) | Challenger W/L | 56% (116/90) |
| 61% (92/59) | Futures W/L | 72% (145/57) |
| 56% (314/556) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (261/413) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (54/110) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (43/74) |
| 49% (84/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (64/128) |
| 87% (313/273) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (263/227) |
| 12% (313/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (263/36) |
| 18% (255/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (155/35) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
